Should USA got in war with Iraq Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Should USA got in war with Iraq - Research Paper mannikinThe war is undeniably il judicial as defined by the United Nations (UN) and Inter rural areaal Court of rightness (ICJ), the two most paramount legal bodies in the world. Iraq had no link to terrorism, no weapons of mass ending (WMD), and no legal rationale to attack. Despite this, render decided to invade the Republic of Iraq for causes deemed objectionable to the volume of other countries so he frequently relied on and utilized false information to rationalize it. He lied. This discussion will examine how the truth was a casualty early and often during the lead up to the war and outlines some of the consequences brought about by these far-reaching and deadly deceptions. bush voiced his disagreement to the concept of nation building during the 2000 presidential election debates but as president waged an undeclared war against a main(a) country that had neither attacked first nor threatened to. Immediately following and a s a reactionary solvent to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, Bush stated the countys intention to begin a War on Terrorism which he portrayed as a protracted battle against those that would use terrorist actions in admission to the countries that enabled them. The eventual culmination of the selective legal reasoning and rhetoric concerning the War on Terror was Bushs order of the military to invade both Afghanistan and Iraq, an illegal action on many fronts. Bush had constantly claimed that these actions were legal. First, he argued, due to language existing within the UN Security Council Resolution 1441 regarding Iraq and secondly, the invasions were an act of self-protection which is permitted by world(prenominal) law. Conversely, according to Richard Perle, advisor to U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and official of the U.S. Defense Policy Board, international law ... would have required us to leave Saddam Hussein alone. (Burkeman & Borger, 2003). However, th is option would have been chastely unacceptable according to the Bush administration. Bush chose to solicit then(prenominal) followed the advice of biased, self serving legal intuitive feeling from a low-level Justice Dept. employee despite strong disagreement by higher level personnel office within the Dept. in addition to and the U.S. State Department which cautioned against ignoring international law and U.N. laws in addition to covenants of the geneva Convention. The Bush administration was determined in its careless use of military force and disregard for laws realized to by the worlds community of nations. The initial foreign incursion of the U.S. military along with the compact of the willing in its War on Terror was Afghanistan, more specifically the Taliban terrorist faction based in that country. The U.S. claimed to possess clear and compelling evidence, that the State of Afghanistan was giving refuge to terrorists, as did Iraq. However, if this assertion were true, why then didnt the Bush administration divulge this information to the UN Security Council so as to obtain legal grounds to invade? The United Nations Charter, Article 51, Chapter Seven stipulates nothing shall impair the inherent right of single or collective self defense if an armed attack occurs against a member of the United Nations